fine-structure constant

2018 CODATA recommended value is 7.297 352 5693 x 10-3 It is a dimensionless number; not a value in units. Symbol, α

α= e 2 4π ε 0 c MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2Caerbbr2BIv gidf2CS9MBGaLCVbqedmvETj2BSbqefyvzYrwyUfgaruavP1wzZbIt LDhis9wBH5garqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGGipv0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4 rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0dbba9vqpe0RYxir=Jbba9q8aq 0=yq=He9q8qqQ8frFve9Fve9qqpeWZqaaeaabiGaciaacaWabmaaea abauaaaOqaaiabeg7aHjabg2da9maalaaabaGaamyzamaaCaaaleqa baGaaGOmaaaaaOqaaiaaisdacqaHapaCcqaH1oqzdaWgaaWcbaGaaG imaaqabaGccqWIpecAcaWGJbaaaaaa@4780@ α= e 2 4π ε 0 c MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2Caerbbr2BIv gidf2CS9MBGaLCVbqedmvETj2BSbqefyvzYrwyUfgaruavP1wzZbIt LDhis9wBH5garqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGGipv0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4 rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0dbba9vqpe0RYxir=Jbba9q8aq 0=yq=He9q8qqQ8frFve9Fve9qqpeWZqaaeaabiGaciaacaWabmaaea abauaaaOqaaiabeg7aHjabg2da9maalaaabaGaamyzamaaCaaaleqa baGaaGOmaaaaaOqaaiaaisdacqaHapaCcqaH1oqzdaWgaaWcbaGaaG imaaqabaGccqWIpecAcaWGJbaaaaaa@477F@

For a long time, it was speculated that 1/α = 1/187, and a great deal of ink was spilled over the significance of that integer. As it turns out, α 1/etc.

Does the fine-structure constant change over time?

If α does change, the change must be less than around 1 part in 10¹⁷ per year.

In 2019, scientists proposed a way of detecting even such a small change¹, based on the spacing of atoms in materials. They calculated that if, for example, α is increasing by 1 part in 10¹⁷ per year, a gold bar would shrink by 1 part in 10⁻18 per year, while a germanium crystal would grow by 10⁻21 per year. Developments in the measuring of lengths, as for example in the gravitational wave detetectors, bring measuring such small changes within the range of possibility.

M. T. Murphy, J. K. Webb, V. V. Flambaum.
Further evidence for a variable fine-structure constant from Keck/HIRES QSO absorption spectra.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol 345, issue 2, pages 609–638 (21 October 2003).
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06970.x

Peter J. Mohr, Barry N. Taylor, and David B. Newell.
CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2006.
Reviews of Modern Physics, 80, 633 – Published 6 June 2008 doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.80.633

opticla Tara M. Fortier, Neil Ashby, James C. Bergquist, Marie Delaney, Scott A. Diddams, Thomas P. Heavner, Leo W. Hollberg, Wayne M. Itano, Steven R. Jefferts, K Kim, Windell Oskay, Thomas E. Parker, Jon H. Shirley, Jason Stalnaker, Filippo Levi, Luca Lorini.
Improved limits on variation of the fine structure constant and violation of local position invariance.
Proceedings of the IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium Jointly with the 21st European Frequency and Time Forum. May 27-June 1, 2007.
<1.3 x 10⁻¹⁶ per year.

1. Lukáš F. Pašteka, Yongliang Hao, Anastasia Borschevsky, Victor V. Flambaum, and Peter Schwerdtfeger.
Material size dependence on fundamental constants.
Physical Review Letters, vol 122, issue 16 (24 April 2019).
doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.160801.

X

Sorry. No information on contributors is available for this page.

home | natural index | search |  contact drawing of envelope |  contributors | 
help | privacy | terms of use